<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Data packs in Account and services</title>
    <link>https://community.three.co.uk/t5/Account-and-services/Data-packs/m-p/37395#M8629</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, Smokey.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That does sound like it might be a better way to do it, and I'm unsure if that's something that's in the works, or if there's a specific reason why that's not the way it's done, but the feedback can still be taken onboard and hopefully it'll change for the better.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pete.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 15:30:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PeteG</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-30T15:30:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Data packs</title>
      <link>https://community.three.co.uk/t5/Account-and-services/Data-packs/m-p/37332#M8608</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;when your data runs out and your add on is still active, why do u only give options to buy expensive low data packs with your balance, I bought a £15 top up hoping to buy a new high data add on and I couldn't get it as my addon was still active, using the net took my balance in like 10 minutes I think you should be able to buy the normal High data addons and cancel the one you are using ,&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 29 Sep 2024 16:29:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.three.co.uk/t5/Account-and-services/Data-packs/m-p/37332#M8608</guid>
      <dc:creator>Smokey</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-29T16:29:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Data packs</title>
      <link>https://community.three.co.uk/t5/Account-and-services/Data-packs/m-p/37395#M8629</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, Smokey.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That does sound like it might be a better way to do it, and I'm unsure if that's something that's in the works, or if there's a specific reason why that's not the way it's done, but the feedback can still be taken onboard and hopefully it'll change for the better.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pete.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 15:30:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.three.co.uk/t5/Account-and-services/Data-packs/m-p/37395#M8629</guid>
      <dc:creator>PeteG</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-30T15:30:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

